AfriForum has slammed the EFF’s push to change the name of the Kruger National Park as “cheap politics.” They argue Mpumalanga’s legislature has no authority to rename a national park. AfriForum’s Marais de Vaal says the park falls under the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act and SANParks, not the province.
Who Decides—and How
De Vaal notes a proposal can go to the Provincial Geographical Names Council, then to the National Geographical Names Council. Afterward, public participation occurs before the Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture makes a final decision. SAGNC chair Dr Nkadimeng Mahosi adds that the Mpumalanga vote “does not go according to what the national act says” and amounts to “political point-scoring.”
Tourism Stakes and Costly Rebranding
The Kruger National Park name change could trigger “severe consequences,” including diluting the park’s global recognition and imposing expensive rebranding, said tourism expert Prof Elmarie Slabbert. The park anchors a tourism economy that contributes significantly through spending, concessions, and jobs. AfriForum argues the money should address pressing challenges at SANParks, not a name change.
Politics, History and a Naming Misstep
EFF representatives linked the park’s current name to Paul Kruger’s legacy. They noted that apartheid was introduced decades after his death. The EFF also floated “Skukuza” as a nickname for the first warden, James Stevenson-Hamilton. Then they conceded the choice was problematic given his role in removals from the park.
What’s Next
AfriForum says it will go to court if legal requirements are ignored. With the Kruger National Park name change still subject to national procedures and public input, the final call rests with the minister after the SAGNC process runs its course.
