US President Donald Trump announced Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s backing for a Gaza peace plan. Specifically, the White House deal aims to end nearly two years of fighting sparked by Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack, which killed 1,200 Israelis and took 251 hostages. Meanwhile, Gaza’s death toll exceeds 66,000, mostly civilians, according to local health authorities. Consequently, Trump called it “a historic day for peace.”
Key Features of the Gaza Peace Plan
The Gaza peace plan demands an immediate ceasefire. For instance, Hamas must release all hostages within 72 hours, while Israel frees Palestinian prisoners in return. Subsequently, Israel withdraws in stages once Hamas disarms. Moreover, the plan destroys Hamas tunnels and weapons under monitors. A technocratic Palestinian committee governs, reporting to a Trump-led “Board of Peace.”
Netanyahu’s Firm Commitment
Netanyahu strongly endorsed the Gaza peace plan, stating it will “bring back hostages, dismantle Hamas’s military power, and ensure Gaza never threatens Israel again.” For now, Israel retains security oversight. However, he rejected Palestinian statehood, calling its recognition a “mark of shame” in a UN speech. Furthermore, he vowed to act alone if Hamas rejects the deal.
Hamas’s Cautious Response
Hamas has not yet replied formally. Instead, Qatari and Egyptian mediators shared the plan. A Hamas official promised a “good faith” review but emphasized that weapons remain a “red line” amid occupation. Historically, their refusals to disarm raise doubts. On the other hand, Palestinian Islamic Jihad slammed the plan, while Tony Blair praised its relief for Gaza. Similarly, Arab states like Saudi Arabia and Egypt welcomed the effort.
Stakes for Lasting Peace
Trump frames the Gaza peace plan as a solution for decades of conflict, avoiding statehood but hinting at self-determination. Currently, Israeli tanks advance in Gaza, testing the truce. With 160,000 injuries and famine risks, the deal tests Trump’s promise for swift peace. Ultimately, Hamas’s response will decide if diplomacy prevails or war persists. South Africans, familiar with unresolved conflicts, feel this moment’s weight. Thus, hope rests on bold action.
